..the following court house scene is what anyone may expect at a judicial event (the audio appears at 1:30; good volume occurs from 2:46 onwards); is worth watching from the begining.
The American court seen here appears paralell to the U.K.’s crown court where the principles of natural justice are enforced. I believe the American and British both appear to be struggling to maintain their integrity in the judicial system; the basic principles are rusting. The criminal activity – secret agenda of the state being labelled administration can only survive for so long.
The U.K.’s Definitive Map [Review] process (my emphasis ‘Review’) became fishy in the 1990s the map has been maliciously modified on a regular basis since DEFRA’s creation 2001 (20 yrs after Wildlife & Countryside Act 1981). DEFRA have added weights and measures to interfere with the principles of natural justice & fairplay or what some call ‘due process’, to obtain new public rights of way procurement by illegal means.
DEFRA appears created from the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, as a means to facilitate the administrative changes required to facilitate frauds on an industrial scale. The foot & mouth pandemic of 2000 appears caused intentionally to facilitate the plethora of fictional discovery frauds administration. Reshuffling of public office to kick-out any whistle-blowers.
Imagine these two characters being aided and abetted by an International Council for Mining and Metals smuggling because they were using the fish to import lead without licence required to import lead; would it seem daft? Would the corruption be caught?
This event illustrates the toxic nature of a fishing contest: we can apply it to how public rights of way inquiries leading to discovery of evidence by cheating should be treated, just as the two fishermen in court; were caught, and are exposed here, facing the principles of natural justice.
The official ‘Review process of the Definitive map’ should take place in a tribunal of law like this American court where a degree of due process can be expected; but it does not.
In the U.K. unconstitutional bias actively supports and facilitates the cheating to expropriate, take land ownership away from an owner because of its desireability and suitability for public use; DEFRA’s political agenda undermines public trust (confidence) in the judicial system.
It’s very confusing to be forced to participate in quasi tribunals, which are always called ‘public inquiry’, but one in which the principles of natural justice is absent because of the absence of a chairman who is independent of the politics. Planning inspectorate appoint their own corrupt inspectors as and when; I do not believe all inspectors are corrupt!
To understand DEFRA’s principles as I see them, requires the know-how and knowledge to invert or inverse any statement made by DEFRA or the Planning Inspectorate which appears too good to be true; Planning Inspectorate like – honi soit qui mal y pense: Shame on him who thinks evil of it* (..motto of the Order of the Garter; *evil to him who evil thinks army varient)
Although fiddling the king’s books was a treasonable offence in 1248; the only (known?) record of the forming of the Order of the Garter emanates from the king’s wardrobe for an event. 12 years earlier; King Edward III (3rd) granted a special licence at Westminster, one that DEFRA, and the Planning Inspectorate and its chronies have ignored; I believe those involved in corrupting public events could learn from the following digression (absolutely!) from Judge Judy:
This video shows public condemnation of conspiracy to defraud, which lead to a court hearing where Mr Fischer @23:23 thanked the court and the Divisional Wildlife for taking the public’s complaint generated by fishing seriously, and that he had read a statistic somewhere that someone that steals or is a thief gets caught approximately 1 out of every 48 times.
Mr Fischer went on to identify the abuse of trust and good faith that he showed the accused; received condemnation from his friends for speaking-up for the two accused during earlier times. That there was never any solid evidence against the two accused until the event when, in his mind; the fish that they weighed in did not pass the eye test; he knew in his gut that he had to do something; he cut the fish open there and then revealing lead weights inside the fish.
No one would expect the evil that was openly challenged to have survived, if challenged in a common law court of England & Wales. In similar fishy fashion to above; DEFRA’s individuals were caught in conspiracy cheating at the waters of Uffculme and Culmstock; waters protected by no ordinary fishing licence; it is one granted by a king at Westminster.
The ancient park granted by Edward III, 17 March 1336, is well documented and, the common law evidence is irrefutable – probative of specific land mass and legal status since 1587, and various taxation from the 18 century onwards.
Just as many of the fishermen in this example doubted the two’s success: “..by winning these events it’s not probable, and it’s definately not even possible..”; the facts do not equate here in the U.K.; the rotten core of public office in the U.K. have been weighting the scales of evidence to falsify changes to land ownership or its dedication for public use. DEFRA appointed its own overtly bent wicked inspectors such as Peter Millman and Helen Slade to adjudicate their own noble cause corruption, have ruined the Definitive Map by a consistency of absurd alernating statements and discoveries defying logic, which can (ordinarily) only be challenged in the High Court; and then, if the challenge is successful, matters re-assessed by DEFRA’s criminals in the Planning Inspectorate.
The statements identifying the aggressive nature of the cheats when challenged in this example mirror the conspired bad faith and menace that was not only received by me, factual evidence is most clear in its demonstrating that Planning Inspectorate and DEFRA act hand in a rigger’s glove during regular sleight of hand activity regarding regular common law evidence during its quasi/sham public inquiries, that not only undermine Parliament’s values, but its intention for an accurate definitive map of public rights of way in the UK. Theft by stealth and deception:
Hook line & sinker; DEFRA’s poachers* have been caught by the ledgers they’ve left, and those illustrating their bad faith in the Upper Culm Valley area, and nationally. [*public servants in Planning Inspectorate, county council and (well known) User Groups like the BHS etc.]
Summary: After years of stealth at Five Fords & Brookshill, Devon U.K. Hunkin Wood was created with public rights of way evidence discovery fraud in mind (not Edward III’s famous 1348 statement found on government headed paper, and always placed obvious in a criminal court of the common law of England & Wales). I believe justice (law) shows Planning Inspectorate’s use and abuse of process, to defraud settled land protected by King Edward III 12 years before the Order of the Garter, with a Pandora’s box of corruption in public office to fiction changes to the Definitive Map, is unsustainable.
Information in this forty minute court hearing provides anyone familiar with DEFRA’s UK kangaroo courts, an example of what happens when you’re caught cheating in the USA; these modern times appear to reveal the U.K. following those across the pond.. ..thank you for this well produced documentary (example) of cheating the public.
God bless America and all that fish there honestly: tight lines!