Does the following hold affinity, correlate with Hilary sitting on the fence re democracy:
The term “politically correct” was used disparagingly, to refer to someone whose loyalty to the Communist Party line overrode compassion, and led to bad politics. It was used by Socialists against Communists, and was meant to separate out Socialists who believed in egalitarian moral ideas from dogmatic Communists who would advocate and defend party positions regardless of their moral substance. -Kohl, Herbert (1992) writing about debates in New York in the late 1940s and early 1950s.
What do we know that would illustrate Hilary’s unsuitability for being Prime Minister of the U.K.; what are his double standards, those that affront democracy?
Why does he appear the opposite of candid, is it his lubricious charm; watch his artistry?
Does he who endorses historical untruths about public history (that of England & Wales) being told, & then charted on a definitive map, not become accountable according to the common laws of that place; England & Wales?